I made that change, as I think we need to ve able to list all available mailing lists, but I didn't want to use the obsolete docs page.
Thinking more about this, maybe a meet in the middle approach is to use the full details on the community page, and revert the front page to focus on the dev list ? Tgoughts ? On Wednesday, October 26, 2016, Jason Azares <jason.aza...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Deron, > > Thanks for publishing the updates, and the site looks great! One thing I > noticed is that the "Subscribe to Our Mailing Lists" section does not > reflect what the design team originally had. I'm not sure if you were aware > of this discrepancy. > > [image: Inline image 1] > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriks...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> Hi Luciano, >> >> Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone >> ahead >> and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more >> frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized. >> >> Deron >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriks...@gmail.com');>> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Luciano, >> > >> > Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the >> > point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree? >> > >> > Deron >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <jason.aza...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jason.aza...@gmail.com');>> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Luciano, >> >> >> >> Initial page: >> >> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner >> ? I >> >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, >> >> but it >> >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, >> >> and I >> >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies >> >> the >> >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the >> banner >> >> on >> >> > the initial page. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the >> >> initial >> >> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to >> >> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently >> >> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed. >> >> >> >> Navigation Menu: >> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few >> >> duplications. >> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We >> also >> >> have >> >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers >> using >> >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers >> >> that >> >> > include the old page listing all committers. >> >> >> >> >> >> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his >> >> updates >> >> once they are finished. >> >> >> >> Hope this clears things up! >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> Jason >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1...@gmail.com');>> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master >> >> branch >> >> > : >> >> > >> >> > Initial page: >> >> > >> >> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner >> ? I >> >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, >> >> but it >> >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, >> >> and I >> >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies >> >> the >> >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the >> banner >> >> on >> >> > the initial page. >> >> > >> >> > Navigation Menu: >> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few >> >> duplications. >> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We >> also >> >> have >> >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers >> using >> >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers >> >> that >> >> > include the old page listing all committers. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I >> think >> >> we >> >> > might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to >> the >> >> live >> >> > website. >> >> > >> >> > Thoughts ? >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Luciano Resende >> >> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > > -- Sent from my Mobile device
