I'd like to merge the index_support branch into the master. I think it would be enough to be merged if two more issues are resolved.
Sincerely, Jihoon On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:31 PM Jaehwa Jung <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hyunsik > > I totally agree with you. > > And if possible, could you add some examples for pluggable storage? For > example, we're already working it such as, kafka, elasticsearch, cassandra. > > Cheers > Jaehwa > 2015. 3. 16. 오후 8:13에 "Hyunsik Choi" <[email protected]>님이 작성: > > > Hi folks, > > > > In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate our effort > > on the next release, we need to discuss the next roadmap. > > Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with new contributors > > due to the growing number of contributors. > > > > As far as I know, the following major issues seem to be resolved in time. > > > > * Nested complex type (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721) > > * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680) > > * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397) > > * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744) > > * Python UDF (TAJO-1344) > > > > The above issues probably can be included in 0.11 release. If there > > are missed issues, please let me know them. > > > > > > Besides, the following feature issues may be on our roadmap: > > > > * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540) > > * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...) > > * Decimal type support > > * Scalar subquery > > * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..) > > * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting of Nested Subqueries, > > ...) > > * Make storage handler more pluggable > > * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214) > > * CREATE FUNCTION statement support > > * CREATE TYPE statement support > > * .... > > > > Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In addition, there are > > many performance issues. I'll describe them later. > > > > Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what issues you are > > considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking forward to > > hearing you guys' feedback. > > > > > > Best regards, > > Hyunsik > > >
