I mean, it will be possible to include the index feature to 0.11 release. Best, Jihoon 2015년 3월 16일 (월) 오후 8:37, Jihoon Son <[email protected]>님이 작성:
> I'd like to merge the index_support branch into the master. > I think it would be enough to be merged if two more issues are resolved. > > Sincerely, > Jihoon > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:31 PM Jaehwa Jung <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Hyunsik >> >> I totally agree with you. >> >> And if possible, could you add some examples for pluggable storage? For >> example, we're already working it such as, kafka, elasticsearch, >> cassandra. >> >> Cheers >> Jaehwa >> 2015. 3. 16. 오후 8:13에 "Hyunsik Choi" <[email protected]>님이 작성: >> >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate our effort >> > on the next release, we need to discuss the next roadmap. >> > Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with new contributors >> > due to the growing number of contributors. >> > >> > As far as I know, the following major issues seem to be resolved in >> time. >> > >> > * Nested complex type (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721) >> > * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680) >> > * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397) >> > * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744) >> > * Python UDF (TAJO-1344) >> > >> > The above issues probably can be included in 0.11 release. If there >> > are missed issues, please let me know them. >> > >> > >> > Besides, the following feature issues may be on our roadmap: >> > >> > * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540) >> > * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...) >> > * Decimal type support >> > * Scalar subquery >> > * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..) >> > * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting of Nested >> Subqueries, >> > ...) >> > * Make storage handler more pluggable >> > * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214) >> > * CREATE FUNCTION statement support >> > * CREATE TYPE statement support >> > * .... >> > >> > Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In addition, there are >> > many performance issues. I'll describe them later. >> > >> > Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what issues you are >> > considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking forward to >> > hearing you guys' feedback. >> > >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Hyunsik >> > >> >
