If there are no further discussion, I'll update the Roadmap page in wiki. - hyunsik
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> wrote: > Absolutely! > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It sounds good to me. >> >> Also remember 'if it doesn't happen on the mailing list, it doesn't >> happen at Apache'. Please read the below mailing list thread, saying >> what we must keep. >> >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201303.mbox/%3ccajwfca0cfjfgq5ncg7gnspezjg1hvy3no-5_kfpd2zxvc-s...@mail.gmail.com%3E >> >> Best regards, >> Hyunsik >> >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Today we have a Tajo regional meetup in Seoul. What about discussing this >> > issue in detail there? >> > >> > Of course, we should post the result here, too. >> > >> > Warmly, >> > Dongjoon >> > >> > On Tuesday, March 17, 2015, Jinho Kim <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> The major issues looks good to me for 0.11.0 release >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> >> -Jinho >> >> Best regards >> >> >> >> 2015-03-16 20:13 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected] >> <javascript:;> >> >> >: >> >> >> >> > Hi folks, >> >> > >> >> > In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate our effort >> >> > on the next release, we need to discuss the next roadmap. >> >> > Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with new contributors >> >> > due to the growing number of contributors. >> >> > >> >> > As far as I know, the following major issues seem to be resolved in >> time. >> >> > >> >> > * Nested complex type (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721 >> ) >> >> > * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680) >> >> > * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397) >> >> > * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744) >> >> > * Python UDF (TAJO-1344) >> >> > >> >> > The above issues probably can be included in 0.11 release. If there >> >> > are missed issues, please let me know them. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Besides, the following feature issues may be on our roadmap: >> >> > >> >> > * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540) >> >> > * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...) >> >> > * Decimal type support >> >> > * Scalar subquery >> >> > * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..) >> >> > * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting of Nested >> Subqueries, >> >> > ...) >> >> > * Make storage handler more pluggable >> >> > * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214) >> >> > * CREATE FUNCTION statement support >> >> > * CREATE TYPE statement support >> >> > * .... >> >> > >> >> > Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In addition, there are >> >> > many performance issues. I'll describe them later. >> >> > >> >> > Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what issues you are >> >> > considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking forward to >> >> > hearing you guys' feedback. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Best regards, >> >> > Hyunsik >> >> > >> >> >>
