Absolutely! On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
> It sounds good to me. > > Also remember 'if it doesn't happen on the mailing list, it doesn't > happen at Apache'. Please read the below mailing list thread, saying > what we must keep. > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201303.mbox/%3ccajwfca0cfjfgq5ncg7gnspezjg1hvy3no-5_kfpd2zxvc-s...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > Best regards, > Hyunsik > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Today we have a Tajo regional meetup in Seoul. What about discussing this > > issue in detail there? > > > > Of course, we should post the result here, too. > > > > Warmly, > > Dongjoon > > > > On Tuesday, March 17, 2015, Jinho Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> The major issues looks good to me for 0.11.0 release > >> Thank you. > >> > >> -Jinho > >> Best regards > >> > >> 2015-03-16 20:13 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > >> >: > >> > >> > Hi folks, > >> > > >> > In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate our effort > >> > on the next release, we need to discuss the next roadmap. > >> > Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with new contributors > >> > due to the growing number of contributors. > >> > > >> > As far as I know, the following major issues seem to be resolved in > time. > >> > > >> > * Nested complex type (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721 > ) > >> > * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680) > >> > * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397) > >> > * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744) > >> > * Python UDF (TAJO-1344) > >> > > >> > The above issues probably can be included in 0.11 release. If there > >> > are missed issues, please let me know them. > >> > > >> > > >> > Besides, the following feature issues may be on our roadmap: > >> > > >> > * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540) > >> > * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...) > >> > * Decimal type support > >> > * Scalar subquery > >> > * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..) > >> > * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting of Nested > Subqueries, > >> > ...) > >> > * Make storage handler more pluggable > >> > * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214) > >> > * CREATE FUNCTION statement support > >> > * CREATE TYPE statement support > >> > * .... > >> > > >> > Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In addition, there are > >> > many performance issues. I'll describe them later. > >> > > >> > Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what issues you are > >> > considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking forward to > >> > hearing you guys' feedback. > >> > > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > Hyunsik > >> > > >> >
