Thank you for your efforts - Jinho
> On 27 Nov 2017, at 09:47, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I'm going to move forward 0.12 release. I just looked into our progress > about 0.12 in Jira. 239 issues are already resolved in 0.12, 11 are in > progress, 58 are scheduled yet are not started. As we discussed early, we > can reschedule not critical issues to next release. > > To prepare 0.12 release, I've just created 'branch-0.12.0' from the current > master. > > Best regards, > Hyunsik Choi > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:22 PM Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If you guys were doing issues scheduled to 0.12, please change fix >> versions. >> >> Dongjin, >> Sure. You can freely change the schedule. >> >> Best regards, >> Hyunsik >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:21 AM Dongjin Lee <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Add to this, it seems like TAJO-1724[^1] and TAJO-1951[^2] was originally >>> aimed to be fixed in 0.12.0 but still not on progress. Could you change >>> their (expected) fix version to later one? And if there is anyone who is >>> working on those issues, I would like to take them. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dongjin >>> >>> [^1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1724 >>> [^2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1951 >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Dongjin Lee <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1. No Problems. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dongjin >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1, I agree with you. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Jihoon >>>>> >>>>> 2016년 9월 13일 (화) 오후 2:02, Jinho Kim <[email protected]>님이 작성: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Hyunsik, >>>>>> >>>>>> We don’t have blocker issue. So I agree with 0.12 release >>>>>> It’s very useful to users, I think. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Jinho >>>>>> Best regards >>>>>> >>>>>> 2016-09-12 18:14 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 0.12 release is being delayed because we haven't finish some issues >>>>>>> scheduled to 0.12. There are many demands on 0.12 release. The main >>>>>> reason >>>>>>> is much different code base between master and 0.11.x. Some users >>> and >>>>>>> developers want to fix bugs in 0.11.x as well as in master branch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it's time to release 0.12 release with the current branch >>> and >>>>>> some >>>>>>> critical remain issues. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My question is two: >>>>>>> * What do you think about it? >>>>>>> * If we agree with 0.12. release, what issues must be included in >>>>> this >>>>>>> release? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm looking forward to your opinions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Hyunsik >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Dongjin Lee* >>>> >>>> >>>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine >>>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr >>>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin: >>>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr >>>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github: >>>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr >>>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter: www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr >>>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>* >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Dongjin Lee* >>> >>> >>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine >>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr >>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin: >>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr >>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github: >>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr >>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter: www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr >>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>* >>> >>
