Hi, As we discussed before, the current branch 0.12.0 is already ready to be released. So, I'd like to move forward with the 0.12.0 release. I'll open a vote for release soon.
Best regards, Hyunsik Choi On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:40 PM Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > I rescheduled in-progress issues which are scheduled at 0.12.0 are not > criticial into 0.13.0. Currently, only TAJO-1925 remains in 0.12.0. > > @Jaehwa, > Could you check the last comment in TAJO-1925? > > Best regards, > Hyunsik Choi > > On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:42 AM Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thank you guys. >> >> I just rescheduled 'OPEN' issues scheduled for 0.12.0 to 0.13.0. If we >> need them for 0.12 or next minor release, we can feel free to reschedule >> them. >> >> I'm going to review in-progress issues for 0.12.0 too. If they are not >> critical, I'll reschedule them to next release. If you have any idea, >> please feel free to give us feedback. >> >> Best regards, >> Hyunsik Choi >> >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:57 AM Jong-young Park <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm glad to hear that. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:28 PM 김 진호 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Thank you for your efforts >>> > >>> > - Jinho >>> > >>> > > On 27 Nov 2017, at 09:47, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Hi guys, >>> > > >>> > > I'm going to move forward 0.12 release. I just looked into our >>> progress >>> > > about 0.12 in Jira. 239 issues are already resolved in 0.12, 11 are >>> in >>> > > progress, 58 are scheduled yet are not started. As we discussed >>> early, we >>> > > can reschedule not critical issues to next release. >>> > > >>> > > To prepare 0.12 release, I've just created 'branch-0.12.0' from the >>> > current >>> > > master. >>> > > >>> > > Best regards, >>> > > Hyunsik Choi >>> > > >>> > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:22 PM Hyunsik Choi < >>> [email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> If you guys were doing issues scheduled to 0.12, please change fix >>> > >> versions. >>> > >> >>> > >> Dongjin, >>> > >> Sure. You can freely change the schedule. >>> > >> >>> > >> Best regards, >>> > >> Hyunsik >>> > >> >>> > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:21 AM Dongjin Lee < >>> [email protected]> >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> Add to this, it seems like TAJO-1724[^1] and TAJO-1951[^2] was >>> > originally >>> > >>> aimed to be fixed in 0.12.0 but still not on progress. Could you >>> change >>> > >>> their (expected) fix version to later one? And if there is anyone >>> who >>> > is >>> > >>> working on those issues, I would like to take them. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Regards, >>> > >>> Dongjin >>> > >>> >>> > >>> [^1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1724 >>> > >>> [^2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1951 >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Dongjin Lee < >>> > [email protected]> >>> > >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> +1. No Problems. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Regards, >>> > >>>> Dongjin >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected] >>> > >>> > >>> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>>> +1, I agree with you. >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> Best, >>> > >>>>> Jihoon >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> 2016년 9월 13일 (화) 오후 2:02, Jinho Kim <[email protected]>님이 작성: >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>>> Hi Hyunsik, >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> We don’t have blocker issue. So I agree with 0.12 release >>> > >>>>>> It’s very useful to users, I think. >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> -Jinho >>> > >>>>>> Best regards >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> 2016-09-12 18:14 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> Hi guys, >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> 0.12 release is being delayed because we haven't finish some >>> issues >>> > >>>>>>> scheduled to 0.12. There are many demands on 0.12 release. The >>> main >>> > >>>>>> reason >>> > >>>>>>> is much different code base between master and 0.11.x. Some >>> users >>> > >>> and >>> > >>>>>>> developers want to fix bugs in 0.11.x as well as in master >>> branch. >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> I think it's time to release 0.12 release with the current >>> branch >>> > >>> and >>> > >>>>>> some >>> > >>>>>>> critical remain issues. >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> My question is two: >>> > >>>>>>> * What do you think about it? >>> > >>>>>>> * If we agree with 0.12. release, what issues must be included >>> in >>> > >>>>> this >>> > >>>>>>> release? >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> I'm looking forward to your opinions. >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> Best regards, >>> > >>>>>>> Hyunsik >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> -- >>> > >>>> *Dongjin Lee* >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale >>> machine >>> > >>>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr >>> > >>>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin: >>> > >>>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr >>> > >>>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github: >>> > >>>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr >>> > >>>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter: >>> www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr >>> > >>>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>* >>> > >>>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> -- >>> > >>> *Dongjin Lee* >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine >>> > >>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr >>> > >>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin: >>> > >>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr >>> > >>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github: >>> > >>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr >>> > >>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter: >>> www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr >>> > >>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>* >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >>> >>
