Hi Chris, +1
That's a great idea. Actually, I've been confused about the same named patches. That idea will be very effective especially when we are doing large works. If there is no any objection, I'll reflect your suggestion to the wiki page. Thanks, Hyunsik On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hyunsik, > > Great work! > > RE: patch naming what do you think about this? > > Normally I name patches: > > <JIRA issue ID #>.<last name>.<yyMMdd>.<n>.patch.txt > > Example for OODT > > OODT-578.Mattmann.032803.patch.txt > > This: > > 1. helps identifier the contributor in the actual patch file by their last > name > (alternative, first letter of first name, and last name or some other > alternative > may be used). > > 2. indicates the date on which the patch was submitted in the file name > > 3. allows for multiple revisions (n parameter) if multiple patches in the > same day > > 4. Adds a .txt at the end, b/c some browsers, and HTTPD servers, don't > understand > that the .patch file extension is actually a text file and thus downloads > instead of > displaying the file in JIRA. > > Thoughts about using the above scheme? I realize you guys will be doing a > bulk > of the work, compared to me, so it's really your choice, but just wanted > to share > the above since I use it in all my projects, and encourage others to as > well and > it's seemed to work out. > > Cheers, > Chris > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Saturday, March 30, 2013 9:09 AM > To: tajo-dev <[email protected]> > Subject: Please review HowToContribute doc > > >Hi folks, > > > >http://wiki.apache.org/tajo/HowToContribute > > > >I've written the first draft of HowToContribute page. I brought the base > >layout and some general descriptions from Hadoop's one ( > >http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute) because Hadoop's one > >already > >contains great and general descriptions. However, I kept only minimum, > >essential, and general guides. If this approach can cause extra noise, > >please inform me. > > > >Could anyone please review this? Feel free to give any suggestion and > >feedback on it. Also, you can edit the wiki page. > > > >Thanks, > >Hyunsik > >
