Sorry guys, I missed prerequisite.
2014/1/20 JaeHwa Jung <[email protected]> > +1 for your idea. > > I also think that this is right time for 0.8 release. > As you mentioned, too time-consuming jobs need to fix for next release. > > And we need to check 0.8 document again because there are not some basic > features for users. For example, there is nothing about hadoop version. > > > > > 2014/1/18 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> > >> Hi folks, >> >> It seems to be right time to think about the 0.8-incubating release. >> Please take a look at the 0.8 roadmap and the current resolved issues. >> >> - 0.8 Roadmap >> https://wiki.apache.org/tajo/Roadmap >> >> - 0.8 unresolved issues >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8-incubating%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> >> Most of scheduled feature are all implemented. Some issues, push-based >> transmission and improvement of intermediate data, are unresolved so >> far. However, in my point of view, they are not critical in this time. >> I think they can be scheduled to next release. >> >> Although there are still bugs listed in 0.8 unresolved issues, we will >> resolve most of them soon if we concentrate on bug fix. >> >> So, if you agree, I would like to suggest to prepare 0.8 release. I >> just listed some issues which must be resolved for 0.8 release at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-512. >> >> I will wait your idea and suggestion. >> >> Thanks, >> Hyunsik >> > > > > -- > Thanks, > Jaehwa Jung > Bigdata Platform Team > Gruter > > -- Thanks, Jaehwa Jung Bigdata Platform Team Gruter
