+1 ! 2014. 2. 20., 오전 10:26, Jinho Kim <[email protected]> 작성:
> +1 > > -Jinho > > > 2014-02-20 10:12 GMT+09:00 JaeHwa Jung <[email protected]>: > >> +1! :) >> >> >> 2014-02-20 10:00 GMT+09:00 Min Zhou <[email protected]>: >> >>> +1 for the approach. >>> >>> Min >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1! >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-02-20 9:50 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> There remain few issues for 0.8. After 0.8, we will refactor resource >>>>> manager, scheduler, and the design of worker part for multi-tenancy >>>>> support. For this, we need to separate the branches right now. If >> there >>>> are >>>>> no objection, I'll create a branch for 0.8. The remain issues for 0.8 >>>> will >>>>> be merged to both 0.8 and master branches. >>>>> >>>>> - hyunsik >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Henry, >>>>>> >>>>>> I appreciate for correcting my wrong statements. You are right. We >>> will >>>>>> release 0.8 three months after 0.2 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think that we want to release 0.8 before potential >>> graduation, >>>>> and >>>>>> it may be hard to do so even if we want. This is because there >> still >>>>> remain >>>>>> some critical issues that we cannot postpone anymore. >>>>>> >>>>>> The main objective of my claim aforementioned is to make two >> branches >>>> for >>>>>> development after 0.8 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Hyunsik >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Henry Saputra <[email protected] >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Hyunsik, I think you meant will release 0.8 three months after >>> 0.2 >>>>>>> release? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do we want to release 0.8 quickly before potential graduation >> VOTE? >>>>>>> If we do then maybe we could remove the more issues, such as the >>>>>>> sub-tasks and improvement, and keep only blocking issues. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Henry >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> I'm rescheduling non-critical issues scheduled in 0.8 to next >>>> release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm considering the next release versions. So far, we have had >>> long >>>>> term >>>>>>>> for each release. We released 0.2 seven months after incubation. >>> We >>>>> also >>>>>>>> released 0.8 three months after 0.2 release. It is because Tajo >>> has >>>>> been >>>>>>>> heavy under development status. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tajo 0.8 seems a product ready level. I'm expecting that there >>> would >>>>> be >>>>>>>> additional use cases on products. In order to support them, we >>> need >>>> to >>>>>>>> release Tajo more frequently with hotfixs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, I would like to propose the develpment based on two >> branches, >>>>> which >>>>>>> one >>>>>>>> is 0.8.x branch and 1.0 branch (master branch in git). 0.8.x >>> branch >>>>>>> will be >>>>>>>> frequently released with hotfixes and new lightwight features. >> 1.0 >>>>>>> branch will >>>>>>>> be developed for a complete system. It will embrace even radical >>>>> changes >>>>>>>> and new features. The next major release, probably 0.9, would be >>>>>>> branched >>>>>>>> from 1.0 branch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you have any idea, feel free to suggest. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - hyunsik >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:30 AM, JaeHwa Jung < >> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sorry guys, I missed prerequisite. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2014/1/20 JaeHwa Jung <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 for your idea. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I also think that this is right time for 0.8 release. >>>>>>>>>> As you mentioned, too time-consuming jobs need to fix for >> next >>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And we need to check 0.8 document again because there are not >>>> some >>>>>>> basic >>>>>>>>>> features for users. For example, there is nothing about >> hadoop >>>>>>> version. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2014/1/18 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It seems to be right time to think about the 0.8-incubating >>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>> Please take a look at the 0.8 roadmap and the current >> resolved >>>>>>> issues. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - 0.8 Roadmap >>>>>>>>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/tajo/Roadmap >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - 0.8 unresolved issues >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8-incubating%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Most of scheduled feature are all implemented. Some issues, >>>>>>> push-based >>>>>>>>>>> transmission and improvement of intermediate data, are >>>> unresolved >>>>> so >>>>>>>>>>> far. However, in my point of view, they are not critical in >>> this >>>>>>> time. >>>>>>>>>>> I think they can be scheduled to next release. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Although there are still bugs listed in 0.8 unresolved >> issues, >>>> we >>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>> resolve most of them soon if we concentrate on bug fix. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, if you agree, I would like to suggest to prepare 0.8 >>>> release. >>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>> just listed some issues which must be resolved for 0.8 >> release >>>> at >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-512. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I will wait your idea and suggestion. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> Hyunsik >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Jaehwa Jung >>>>>>>>>> Bigdata Platform Team >>>>>>>>>> Gruter >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Jaehwa Jung >>>>>>>>> Bigdata Platform Team >>>>>>>>> Gruter >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jihoon Son >>>> >>>> Database & Information Systems Group, >>>> Prof. Yon Dohn Chung Lab. >>>> Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, >>>> Korea University >>>> 1, 5-ga, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, >>>> Seoul, 136-713, Republic of Korea >>>> >>>> Tel : +82-2-3290-3580 >>>> E-mail : [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> My research interests are distributed systems, parallel computing and >>> bytecode based virtual machine. >>> >>> My profile: >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/coderplay >>> My blog: >>> http://coderplay.javaeye.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Jaehwa Jung >> Bigdata Platform Team >> Gruter >>
