I am pretty sure that there are quite a few helping hands for asciidoc integration into our CMS. All the svnpubsub doesn't require markdown. It's just that this is provided out of the box. But basically all stuff you can trigger with a perl script is just fine. Maybe we need to ping infra to install a few bits to our buildfarm.
LieGrue, strub > On Tuesday, 25 November 2014, 19:53, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Gerhard Petracek > <[email protected]> wrote: >> @john: > > I'm not advocating or recommending using a wiki, I'm simply laying out > the facts to those who requested info. > > Since Anatole had already done a lot of the groundwork in asciidoc, I > was hoping the project would lean more towards using that, which would > feed into the CMS (similar to what we did on DS and how BatchEE's > setup). > > >> #1 it isn't that clear how long the wikis will be around at all >> #2 you have a lot of overhead to moderate a wiki >> #3 the version history isn't that nice >> #4 all wikis we could use are very slow (on a regular basis - e.g. due to >> high load) >> >> those and other issues resulted in the creation of our cms. >> i don't see a real benefit of using one of the available wikis (after > using >> them in other projects for years). >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> >> >> 2014-11-25 19:31 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >> >>> You could take a quick look at the DeltaSpike CMS setup. It's > basically >>> all in SVN. >>> >>> And then we also need to ping infra via JIRA that they should enable > it. >>> >>> There are a few docs >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/cmsref.html >>> http://wiki.apache.org/general/ApacheCms2010 >>> >>> >>> From the usage it boils down that you just go to a random Apache page > and >>> click a bookmark which contains a small javascript. This will then > prompt >>> your credentials you can edit online. >>> >>> Or you just checkout the page via SVN and edit offline + commit when > you >>> are finished. Buildbot will then take the changes and stages it. After > a >>> review you can then publish your changes via a simple click. >>> >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > On Tuesday, 25 November 2014, 19:24, Anatole Tresch > <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > Fair enough. Just guide us what would the optimal solution so > we can >>> start >>> > working on it... ;) >>> > >>> > - >>> > Anatole Tresch >>> > Glärnischweg 10 >>> > 8620 Wetzikon >>> > Tel +41 (43) 317 05 30 >>> > - >>> > Send from Mobile >>> > >>> > >>> >> Am 25.11.2014 um 19:02 schrieb "John D. Ament" >>> > <[email protected]>: >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 12:17:19 PM Anatole Tresch >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> OK. We had a discussion before with John, where a Wiki > for me looked >>> > more >>> >>> the way to go.. Is there some initial CMS starter > template we get with >>> > the >>> >>> initial setup? >>> >> >>> >> I think calling the vote was probably a little quick. > It's possible >>> > Mark >>> >> and Gerhard didn't see the discussion yet though. >>> >> >>> >> In the end, you do need to have a tamaya.incubator.apache.org > which is >>> >> hosted by the CMS. When I sent the links out for Cassandra, > it was one >>> >> example that I had seen where most of the content was on the > moinmoin >>> wiki, >>> >> a little bit in CMS, remainder on an external site. What it > sounded >>> like >>> >> was useful was to put most of the content on the wiki for > now, and a >>> little >>> >> bit on the website. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-11-25 17:54 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek >>> > <[email protected]>: >>> >>> >>> >>>> hi anatole, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> in the long-run we have to use apache-cms (at least > for our site). >>> >>>> -> imo we should use it from the beginning. >>> >>>> (it's a bit more work initially. however, once > you are used to >>> > it, it's >>> >>>> quite nice and way faster.) >>> >>>> >>> >>>> regards, >>> >>>> gerhard >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> 2014-11-25 17:44 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch >>> > <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Hi all >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I propose to use a Wiki for our project site (we > can still link >>> > it to >>> >>>> other >>> >>>>> resources such as JavaDoc and maven site). The > question is >>> > should we go >>> >>>> for >>> >>>>> - Confluence >>> >>>>> - Moin Moin >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I prefer confluence, so +1 for confluence. Other > opinions? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Cheers, >>> >>>>> Anatole >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> -- >>> >>>>> *Anatole Tresch* >>> >>>>> Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead >>> >>>>> Glärnischweg 10 >>> >>>>> CH - 8620 Wetzikon >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* >>> >>>>> *Twitter: @atsticks* >>> >>>>> *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ >>> >>>>> <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79* >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Anatole Tresch* >>> >>> Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead >>> >>> Glärnischweg 10 >>> >>> CH - 8620 Wetzikon >>> >>> >>> >>> *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* >>> >>> *Twitter: @atsticks* >>> >>> *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ >>> >>> <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* >>> >>> >>> >>> *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79* >>> >>> >>> > >>> >
