+1 for using the same workflow as deltaspike

regards,
gerhard



2014-11-26 23:38 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]>:

> I agree with Romain. In the first time with only a few developers we
> should concentrate on speed. Later we can/must/should define a more formal
> way for our commit workflow. From my point of view it depends on the
>  maturity of the software.
>
> BTW, independent of the way we choose, we need a plan. But as Anatole
> already wrote, we will start the discussion tomorow.
>
> wdyt?
>
> Bye,
>
> Oliver
>
> Am 26.11.14 22:21, schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
>
>  Hi
>>
>> -1 for tomee one whatever we choose (too complicated for few gain or
>> illegal gains @apache if used).
>>
>> DS is nice IMHO however I think we can even skip review step for now -
>> ie we have a master, then we'll get "tags" and "maintenance branches".
>> Idea is to make project evolving quickly at the beginning where I
>> guess we'll get few committers then when the project will be more
>> active we can change it.
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-11-26 22:01 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I'd like to bring up the discussion around commit workflow.  Basically,
>>> how
>>> does source code get into the apache repo?
>>>
>>> There are many options out there for projects to use.  I'll link to a few
>>> below (all existing apache projects):
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/How%20to%20Contribute
>>> http://deltaspike.apache.org/suggested-git-workflows.html
>>> http://usergrid.readthedocs.org/en/latest/presentations-
>>> and-videos/presentations.html#how-to-contribute-to-apache-usergrid
>>> http://tomee.apache.org/dev/source-code.html
>>>
>>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> P +49 30 44793251
> M +49 178 7903538
> E [email protected]
> S oliver.b.fischer
> J [email protected]
> X http://xing.to/obf
>
>

Reply via email to