annotation or annotations? :p. More seriously: what's the issue with "mapping" for @ConfiguredX, @WithX - we'll surely need to rename it to something more intuitive - and dynamic, event, listener for @ConfigChangeListener?
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-05 19:26 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]>: > +1 because it helps us to find what we need... IMHO > > Am 05.12.14 15:38, schrieb Otávio Gonçalves de Santana: >> >> full name is really better. >> "org.apache.tamaya.annotation", >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Looking not only at Java EE (http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/) you'll >>> find plenty of packages from "javax.annotation" to >>> "javax.servlet.annotation", etc. >>> >>> I already raised this to Anatole before Tamaya, that >>> "org.apache.tamaya.annot" should be called >>> "org.apache.tamaya.annotation", >>> too. >>> >>> Anybody against that?;-) >>> >>> I could also create a JIRA ticket for that. >>> >>> Werner >>> >> >> > > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf >
