I would like to see a similar feature set in SE only as well as with CDI/Spring. Also the listener/event functionality will probably not be 100% similar as in CDI (I see use cases, where an instance is only informed on config changes affecting the instance, but not the rest of the system). I also struggled with the name of this annotation, but let it be since I knew we will discuss on it for sure here... As an alternative we could also call it differently, e.g. @ConfigUpdate .
WDYT? 2014-12-06 8:43 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > Ok. Wonder if the listener annotation makes sense btw. We can use an > interface in standalone and I am sure we ll strongly type it to integrate > it with spring cdi etc.. giving the property change event and the config > object instance. > > Wdyt? > Le 6 déc. 2014 02:13, "Anatole Tresch" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Hi all > > > > I would simply put all into a package called *mapping*, based on the > > discussions we had this looks most feasible for me For met that looks > good. > > If we have more event related annotations, we might reconsider adding an > > additional one. > > > > WDYT? > > > > Anatole > > > > > > 2014-12-05 19:44 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > > > > annotation or annotations? :p. > > > > > > More seriously: what's the issue with "mapping" for @ConfiguredX, > > > @WithX - we'll surely need to rename it to something more intuitive - > > > and dynamic, event, listener for @ConfigChangeListener? > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > @rmannibucau > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > > > 2014-12-05 19:26 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected] > >: > > > > +1 because it helps us to find what we need... IMHO > > > > > > > > Am 05.12.14 15:38, schrieb Otávio Gonçalves de Santana: > > > >> > > > >> full name is really better. > > > >> "org.apache.tamaya.annotation", > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Werner Keil <[email protected] > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> Looking not only at Java EE (http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/) > > > you'll > > > >>> find plenty of packages from "javax.annotation" to > > > >>> "javax.servlet.annotation", etc. > > > >>> > > > >>> I already raised this to Anatole before Tamaya, that > > > >>> "org.apache.tamaya.annot" should be called > > > >>> "org.apache.tamaya.annotation", > > > >>> too. > > > >>> > > > >>> Anybody against that?;-) > > > >>> > > > >>> I could also create a JIRA ticket for that. > > > >>> > > > >>> Werner > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > N Oliver B. Fischer > > > > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > > > > P +49 30 44793251 > > > > M +49 178 7903538 > > > > E [email protected] > > > > S oliver.b.fischer > > > > J [email protected] > > > > X http://xing.to/obf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Anatole Tresch* > > Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead > > Glärnischweg 10 > > CH - 8620 Wetzikon > > > > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* > > *Twitter: @atsticks* > > *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ > > <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* > > > > *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79* > > > -- *Anatole Tresch* Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead Glärnischweg 10 CH - 8620 Wetzikon *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* *Twitter: @atsticks* *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79*
