yes that's exactly how I also imagine it. Worked well enough in CODI and DeltaSpike already. If users have conflicts then they can only blame themselves - similar to having classes with a 'foreign' package name. Technically we cannot really prevent this.
LieGrue, strub > On Tuesday, 6 January 2015, 8:19, Oliver B. Fischer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear all, > > did we already agreed on the format of property names? For me a property > name looks like this > > configProperty=true > [email protected] > org.ÖÜÄ.v90=ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ > > Bye, > > Oliver > > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf >
