Let s vote no? Le 11 févr. 2015 13:01, "Anatole Tresch" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> maybe that's ok for Google, but not for me. We should really minimize the > deps, and as I said adding deps just of a tool, then the tool is broken > IMO. > And adding a production dependency is quite a harsh thing, it must be well > legitimated IMO, which in our case I do not see it. We can use FindBugs > plugin and the other quality tools (e.g. Sonar), from my experience this is > far enough. Finally most of the checks can be covered by writing tests as > well... > > 2015-02-11 12:47 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]>: > > > For Google Guava it works quite well... Why not for us? > > > > Am 11.02.15 um 12:15 schrieb Anatole Tresch: > > > >> And as I said you add an additional dependency to your production code, > >> which is not necessary. For me an absolute no-go... > >> > >> > >> 2015-02-11 12:06 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: > >> > >> Well as Anatole said it seems just a single place. > >>> Why just there and is there significant value using it in many places? > >>> > >>> I've used the FindBugs plugin a lot without the annotations, it worked > >>> well > >>> there, too. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Oliver B. Fischer < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > -- > > N Oliver B. Fischer > > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > > P +49 30 44793251 > > M +49 178 7903538 > > E [email protected] > > S oliver.b.fischer > > J [email protected] > > X http://xing.to/obf > > > > > > > -- > *Anatole Tresch* > Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead > Glärnischweg 10 > CH - 8620 Wetzikon > > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* > *Twitter: @atsticks* > *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ > <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* > > *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79* >
