hey, +1 to remove it
we do not need these annotation imo another option (but i'm also -1 for this) is to add <optional>true</optional> because afaik if annotations are not there at runtime, they will be ignored! lg reini 2015-02-11 14:17 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]>: > But why for extensions? Then we should prohibit all other dependencies. > > Am 11.02.15 um 13:48 schrieb Anatole Tresch: > > For me the same: -1 as well for extensions. >> >> 2015-02-11 13:47 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]>: >> >> Can we use it in the extension modules? >>> >>> Am 11.02.15 um 13:44 schrieb Anatole Tresch: >>> >>> Of course, still the same opinion: +1 for removing it... >>>> >>>> 2015-02-11 13:33 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> @Anatole, though you started or restarted the conversation, the person >>>> >>>>> who >>>>> starts a vote is also allowed and supposed to vote;-) >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> écrit >>>>> minimize >>>>> be >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> N Oliver B. Fischer >>> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany >>> P +49 30 44793251 >>> M +49 178 7903538 >>> E [email protected] >>> S oliver.b.fischer >>> J [email protected] >>> X http://xing.to/obf >>> >>> >>> >> > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf > >
