>From Cologne or even Düsseldorf?;-O After my DeviceMap talk in Rome I also fly back with Germanwings on Sunday btw.
About META-INF/javaconfiguration.properties will have a look at the user guide, but out of curiosity, since I deal with java.util.logging in other places, is there a way to override default properties via something like -Dtamaya.config.properties=<path of file> already? If not, how do you feel about such option? Werner On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Anatole Tresch <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all > > I committed a big update some minutes ago containing: > > > - I created a sandbox module directory moving many of the unfinished, > unstable, empty parts into it. > - I implemented a default behaviour and adapted the minimal > implementation in core, that adds System Props and all files found on > META-INF/javaconfiguration.properties (as already described by the > current > user guide). > - I fixed some design issues in formats and adapte all code affected. > - I was going through a lot of code (not all) of existing modules and > reduced API footprint, things exposed, where I find it not necessary. > E.g. > where URL is taken as resource input, it is not necessary to have files > on > top of it. > - Removed code that duplicates aspects already solved in other modules, > e.g. formats. In one case I extended the formats module with a method > removed, hereby extending the (already existing) generic functionality > instead of reimplementing a non generic approach. > - I added an *examples *folder and created a first couple of isolated > examples illustrating some of the features we have now in place, > starting > from simple, writing your own PropertySource, using resources, resolver > and > events module. I used them during my talk today. Beside the events > example > (there is an issue in the events module I have to fix), everything > should > work. > > Please review the modules that were not written by me for changes done. If > you have deep disagrees let us discuss things here on the mailing list, > what we can do. > > @Oliver The current build will fail, because FindBugs again comes up with a > useless false positive (can you switch that rule out completely ;) ): > The class org.apache.tamaya.metamodel.simple.SimpleConfigProvider$1 could > be refactored into a named _static_ inner class > ["org.apache.tamaya.metamodel.simple.SimpleConfigProvider$1"] At > SimpleConfigProvider.java:[lines 67-72] > > I also commented out Arquilian deps on core, because I had issues with it > during test execution. Perhaps somebody can have a look at that so we can > reenable/readd these tests again... > > Thanks and have a good night. > > Cheers, > Anatole > > PS.: Be with me, I have to fly back tomorrow with GermanWings... >
