I just try to keep core as minimalistic as possible, so basically
everything that I can see can be done outside of it easily, IMO should be
done outside, if its not (Java) API relevant...

2015-03-25 12:07 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:

> well IMO altdd as a module doesnt make much sense since using its own
> source is as easy as configuring it IMO. Just mentionned it for spec side
> of things but maybe we don't need it in tamaya
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-03-25 12:03 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <[email protected]>:
>
> > I would say we can add alt-dd as a module (simply adds another overriding
> > property source).
> > The name is just "historically grown", we can discuss it ,)
> >
> > 2015-03-25 10:14 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > From a spec perspective we should support altdd (even if I never used
> it)
> > > and hardcoded name. If you want another name you register another
> > property
> > > source (that said a default provider adding one if this property is set
> > can
> > > work).
> > >
> > > Side question: why don't we use tamaya.properties while project is
> tamaya
> > > and not javaconfiguration?
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > >
> > > 2015-03-25 10:11 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > > From Cologne or even Düsseldorf?;-O
> > > >
> > > > After my DeviceMap talk in Rome I also fly back with Germanwings on
> > > Sunday
> > > > btw.
> > > >
> > > > About META-INF/javaconfiguration.properties will have a look at the
> > user
> > > > guide, but out of curiosity, since I deal with java.util.logging in
> > other
> > > > places, is there a way to override default properties via something
> > like
> > > > -Dtamaya.config.properties=<path of file> already?
> > > > If not, how do you feel about such option?
> > > >
> > > > Werner
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Anatole Tresch <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Dear all
> > > > >
> > > > > I committed a big update some minutes ago containing:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >    - I created a sandbox module directory moving many of the
> > > unfinished,
> > > > >    unstable, empty parts into it.
> > > > >    - I implemented a default behaviour and adapted the minimal
> > > > >    implementation in core, that adds System Props and all files
> found
> > > on
> > > > >    META-INF/javaconfiguration.properties (as already described by
> the
> > > > > current
> > > > >    user guide).
> > > > >    - I fixed some design issues in formats and adapte all code
> > > affected.
> > > > >    - I was going through a lot of code (not all) of existing
> modules
> > > and
> > > > >    reduced API footprint, things exposed, where I find it not
> > > necessary.
> > > > > E.g.
> > > > >    where URL is taken as resource input, it is not necessary to
> have
> > > > files
> > > > > on
> > > > >    top of it.
> > > > >    - Removed code that duplicates aspects already solved in other
> > > > modules,
> > > > >    e.g. formats. In one case I extended the formats module with a
> > > method
> > > > >    removed, hereby extending the (already existing) generic
> > > functionality
> > > > >    instead of reimplementing a non generic approach.
> > > > >    - I added an *examples *folder and created a first couple of
> > > isolated
> > > > >    examples illustrating some of the features we have now in place,
> > > > > starting
> > > > >    from simple, writing your own PropertySource, using resources,
> > > > resolver
> > > > > and
> > > > >    events module. I used them during my talk today. Beside the
> events
> > > > > example
> > > > >    (there is an issue in the events module I have to fix),
> everything
> > > > > should
> > > > >    work.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please review the modules that were not written by me for changes
> > done.
> > > > If
> > > > > you have deep disagrees let us discuss things here on the mailing
> > list,
> > > > > what we can do.
> > > > >
> > > > > @Oliver The current build will fail, because FindBugs again comes
> up
> > > > with a
> > > > > useless false positive (can you switch that rule out completely ;)
> ):
> > > > > The class org.apache.tamaya.metamodel.simple.SimpleConfigProvider$1
> > > could
> > > > > be refactored into a named _static_ inner class
> > > > > ["org.apache.tamaya.metamodel.simple.SimpleConfigProvider$1"] At
> > > > > SimpleConfigProvider.java:[lines 67-72]
> > > > >
> > > > > I also commented out Arquilian deps on core, because I had issues
> > with
> > > it
> > > > > during test execution. Perhaps somebody can have a look at that so
> we
> > > can
> > > > > reenable/readd these tests again...
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks and have a good night.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Anatole
> > > > >
> > > > > PS.: Be with me, I have to fly back tomorrow with GermanWings...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Anatole Tresch*
> > Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead
> > Glärnischweg 10
> > CH - 8620 Wetzikon
> >
> > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
> > *Twitter:  @atsticks*
> > *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
> > <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>*
> >
> > *Google: atsticksMobile  +41-76 344 62 79*
> >
>



-- 
*Anatole Tresch*
Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead
Glärnischweg 10
CH - 8620 Wetzikon

*Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
*Twitter:  @atsticks*
*Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
<http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>*

*Google: atsticksMobile  +41-76 344 62 79*

Reply via email to