On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:37 AM Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why, is MIT incompliant or at least "not liked" by Apache?;-O > No, its perfectly fine to use as long as called out in NOTICE and LICENSE. > Plus isn't that only part of the "site" or where would jQuery be used by > Tamaya as such during runtime? > So I guess this may lie better with my perspective. If the site can be excluded from the source release, we have nothing to worry about. > > We have an even more dubious case of a "license assumption" since the W3C > WG for DDR never properly put a license statement into their deliverables, > so we needed a special NOTICE file for certain parts of DeviceMap: > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/trunk/clients/w3c-ddr/simpleddr/NOTICE?view=markup > Having a similar paragraph in a NOTICE file or files of Tamaya should do > IMHO. > > Especially Bruno from SouJava (with Otavio representing them at Tamaya) > should be able to say something about that, too. > > CU tomorrow, > > Werner > > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Oliver B. Fischer < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I just fixed the HTTP/HTTPS issue Philipp discovered after publishing the > > homepage. To solve this problem I had to add all original remote hostet > > resources to our repository. The resources copied from Twitter Bootstrap > > are under the ASF 2.0 license. Only jQuery is licensed unter the MIT > > license. > > > > I think this could be a possible issue for the source distribution of > > Tamaya. > > > > WDYT? > > > > Oliver > > > > -- > > N Oliver B. Fischer > > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > > P +49 30 44793251 > > M +49 178 7903538 > > E [email protected] > > S oliver.b.fischer > > J [email protected] > > X http://xing.to/obf > > > > >
