On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:20 AM Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, it seems to be ok to mention it in the license file. I will add this. > > While OK, its not the preferred approach. Any reason we must include the website in the source distribution? > Am 09.05.16 um 14:00 schrieb Werner Keil: > > Probably keep it in a separate Maven module with the appropriate NOTICE > > file? > > Then the actual library has less to worry about. > > > > > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:25 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:37 AM Werner Keil <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> No, its perfectly fine to use as long as called out in NOTICE and > LICENSE. > >> > >> > >> > >> So I guess this may lie better with my perspective. If the site can be > >> excluded from the source release, we have nothing to worry about. > >> > >> > >> deliverables, > >> > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/trunk/clients/w3c-ddr/simpleddr/NOTICE?view=markup > >> the > >> Bootstrap > > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf > >
