[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAMAYA-327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16352913#comment-16352913
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAMAYA-327:
---------------------------------------
Github user ottlinger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya/pull/11
@peculater as discussed on the mailing list, would you mind to finish up
the pull request?
Keeping the order makes sense and doing that more consistently even more ;-)
Thanks for spotting the bug.
> Inconsistent signature for creating ConversionContext
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAMAYA-327
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAMAYA-327
> Project: Tamaya
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: William Lieurance
> Priority: Major
>
> During some additional testing in the API added as part of TAMAYA-288, I came
> across an inconsistency between the ConversionContext and the
> ConversionContext.Builder. Namely, the comments say that supportedFormats
> have their order maintained, which is consistent with the use of an ArrayList
> here
> [https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya/blob/master/code/api/src/main/java/org/apache/tamaya/spi/ConversionContext.java#L42]
> . The builder, however implements the same supportedFormats with a HashSet,
> which does not ensure order. See
> [https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya/blob/master/code/api/src/main/java/org/apache/tamaya/spi/ConversionContext.java#L148]
> .
> I'm planning on creating a pull request with the additional tests for that
> object as well as a patch to more consistently maintain order (all
> ArrayLists). Please let me know if the better answer is to more consistently
> leave order unspecified (all HashSets).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
