More than that, I think it's a great way to go, though I did like
someone's suggestion that the addDefaultModules() be altered so you
can do "addModules(String pattern)", and have that definiable in
web.xml. Mui convenient, but I haven't thought through the
difficulties, and also don't know the ioc infrastructure well enough
to know if that's a pain to implement.
Christian.
On 6-Nov-07, at 4:53 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
On Nov 6, 2007 8:28 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this comes down to whether or not the TapestryFillter (or,
really, TapestryAppInitializer) invokes
IOCUtilities.addDefaultModules(). If that's turned off (perhaps
based
on an entry in web.xml), then the AppModule can pick up the slack
with
explicit SubModule annotations.
So this is a behaviour of tapestry-core not a change in the IoC, by me
is perfectly acceptable.
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
