The vote has either failed or been retracted because of TAPESTRY-2074. I've fixed TAPESTRY-2074.
I'll be generating a new build, 5.0.9. I'll add a note to 5.0.8's release notes that it was rejected. Expect a new vote on 5.0.9 shortly. On Jan 23, 2008 7:56 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree, this is a good thing. Catching an error like this internally > is exactly what the process is meant to do. > > > On Jan 23, 2008 7:45 AM, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I could go either way. Jesse brings up a good point, but it's also how the > > httpd works. They just note in the changelog that there was not a public > > release of the skipped version numbers *shrug* > > > > I'd say the most confusing aspect is that to the best of my knowledge, > > Tapestry has never done this before. But, that's not necessarily a bad > > thing either. > > > > -- > > Kevin > > > > > > On 1/23/08 10:08 AM, in article > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Jesse Kuhnert" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I don't know. In my mind if it wasn't released (as a follow up to > > > this vote) - then it doesn't/hasn't existed. > > > > > > It will make much less sense to go to this page > > > http://tapestry.apache.org/news.html - and see a version skip. > > > Everyone that uses T5 will notice this and wonder why. > > > > > > my 2 cents.. > > > > > > On Jan 23, 2008 10:05 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I've thought of that as well, and it may be easier for me. It's just > > >> that 5.0.8 is still a "virtual" release, up until the vote is > > >> successful ... but that vote is withdrawn due to this blocker bug. > > >> > > >> What do people think? Re-do 5.0.8 or just skip it for 5.0.9? It's > > >> pretty much the same amount of work for me. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Jan 23, 2008 6:08 AM, Massimo Lusetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> On Jan 23, 2008 2:58 AM, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Yep - i feel that's the whole idea of this process > > >>> > > >>> Why simply drop 5.0.8, cast a 5.0.9 and mark 5.0.8 as "failed" release? > > >>> > > >>> Having two 5.0.8 simply doesn't make sense to me even if T5 is still > > >>> beta... > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> > > >>> Massimo > > >>> http://meridio.blogspot.com > > >>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Howard M. Lewis Ship > > >> > > >> Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
