Hi Howard, Property sounds better. This is really a nice feature, is it advisable to use it with hibernate's entitiy classes?
A.C. Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > > Just struck me, would @Property be a better name for the annotation > than @GenerateAccessors? > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Christian Edward Gruber > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I hear you. I'm hoping to use this all over the place now, since most >> accessors are boilerplate. Always hated them... or rather the manual >> creation of them. >> >> Christian. >> >> >> On 5-Mar-08, at 16:22 , Howard Lewis Ship wrote: >> > >> > I just got a little greedy about removing code and raising the code >> > coverage % a little. :-) >> > >> > Stuck at 93% isn't too bad, though. >> > >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-adding-accessors-back-to-corelib-components--tp15857551p15864931.html Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
