hi, This feature is nice, however i think it's good in the page classes, if you need to refer to those getter/setters from other class, this will not work as compiler will complain that symbol not found, anyway, it's really a cool feature as long as used in the right place, I like that.
A.C. nirvdrum wrote: > > I like the name @Property better . . . maps better to the language-level > construct of properties. @GenerateAccessors, while descriptive, is > verbose. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-adding-accessors-back-to-corelib-components--tp15857551p15865489.html Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
