>> What's the reason for this? Should we be doing the same thing for
>> 4.1.X files (I see many versions
>> of those in the dist folder)?
>
> Apache guidelines are that only the latest stable releases should be
> maintained.  Others are available for secondary backups.

ok, i guess then it doesn't hurt to leave the 4.1.2-4.1.5 files there.

> tapestry-project should be renamed to tapestry5-project to deal with
> this.  I believe that to be the only conflict (tapestry-annotations
> was renamed to tapestry5-annotations for similar reasons).

there's also tapestry-test

>
>
>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
>
> Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-- 
Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.andyhot.gr
Tapestry / Tacos developer
Open Source / JEE Consulting

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to