> It's not a good idea to force one framework (EJB3) to the users of another > framework (Tapestry, Tapestry-IoC). But it's a good idea to add support for > other frameworks.
Agreed - my intention never was to force EJB to anyone. But I think supporting JSR-299 and -330 would be a good thing, because if I understand it correctly we then get integration with EJB for free. Not sure, but I think Spring would then be available for free as well... > A nitpick: JSRs 303 and 330 are targeted at Java SE, not Java EE. Maybe they were once targetted at JavaSE, but all three of them are now included in JavaEE 6: http://java.sun.com/javaee/technologies/index.jsp (This means we finally have a DI standard in each and every JavaEE application server..) Piero --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
