Em Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:22:37 -0200, Piero Sartini <[email protected]> escreveu:

Agreed - my intention never was to force EJB to anyone. But I think supporting JSR-299 and -330 would be a good thing, because if I understand it correctly we then get integration with EJB for free.

330 is a little JSR, so I guess the effort wouldn't be large.
299 I haven't read yet, but I guess it's way larger.

Not sure, but I think Spring would then be
available for free as well...

Spring already is available.

(This means we finally have a DI standard in each and every JavaEE
application server..)

Yes. And we should had a DI standard for Java, not just for Java EE. That's what I think was a serious error of 299 that was only corrected (if it was corrected) after 330 was started.

--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor Owner, software architect and developer, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to