From the discussion so far it seems that there will be no majority for migrating the documentation
to some content managament system like the confluence wiki. But what about the site itself? Do we
want it to be kept under source control too?
Uli
On 26.02.2010 13:09, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd like to start improving the documentation (layout, structure and
content). As a first step I'd like to decouple it from the release
cycle. With the current process, documentation changes are only possible
with a new release as only then the site is generated and uploaded to
the right places (of course, someone could generate the site with the
most recent content and upload it but that's cumbersome).
I propose moving the site's content to cwiki.apache.org to make changes
to the documentation easier. The autoexport plugin will generate static
html files from our wiki which then can be copied to the right directory
with a cron job on people.a.o.
What do you think?
Uli
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
