I believe that the main site could be generated as well. I update my
site for every article and it is just a git push command.
What do you think about leveraging the current wiki? The last time, I
looked the articles had different quality and structure. The
organization has already improved but we could provide a better layout
as well and move the stuff to a confluence wiki.
Ulrich Stärk schrieb:
Yeah, but do we also need and want it for the site itself or will it be
enough for the docs? I believe that a confluence backed up site
seperated from the docs themselves can have benefits, e.g. easier
publishing of news, articles and so on. We'd become more dynamic.
On 31.03.2010 21:07, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
I prefer the textile approach, just making it easier to write& deploy
docs.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Ulrich Stärk<[email protected]> wrote:
I guess we should decide first whether we want the whole site in source
control and done with Textile (or some other tool) or if we want to
split
documentation and site and have site in some content management
system like
the confluence wiki.
Uli
On 31.03.2010 18:49, Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote:
Hi all,
I am sorry for not being present at the moment. I am extremely busy
in a
new project. I will try to provide a Prototype using Textile as
rendering base for the end of next week.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
Best Regards / Viele Grüße
Sebastian Hennebrueder
-----
Software Developer and Trainer for Hibernate / Java Persistence
http://www.laliluna.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
