Hi Do you mind if we (in the fututre and if you are interested in our proposal) mirror the conluence wiki to wookicentral for feedback feature ? Is it possible in terms of license, has confluence an API to extract wikis content so we can automatically import it on wooki
The book will be read-only and only comments will be allowed so you can have access to user direct feedback through RSS Best Regards, Christophe. 2010/4/1 Ulrich Stärk <[email protected]> > OK, if the PMC votes on that, I'll take care of it. The vote just has to > mention for me to get a confluence admin account as those are normally > granted only to PMC members. > > Uli > > > On 31.03.2010 22:44, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > >> I'm fine with anything that doesn't end up as a giant unresolved TODO >> item in my list :-) I have more than enough of those already. >> >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Ulrich Stärk<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Publishing the website from a confluence wiki is already set up >>> throughout >>> the ASF and works quite well. That would also be seperated from the >>> "real" >>> wiki. We could move that one to a confluence instance as well and clean >>> it >>> up. >>> >>> On 31.03.2010 22:12, Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I believe that the main site could be generated as well. I update my >>>> site for every article and it is just a git push command. >>>> >>>> What do you think about leveraging the current wiki? The last time, I >>>> looked the articles had different quality and structure. The >>>> organization has already improved but we could provide a better layout >>>> as well and move the stuff to a confluence wiki. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ulrich Stärk schrieb: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, but do we also need and want it for the site itself or will it >>>>> be enough for the docs? I believe that a confluence backed up site >>>>> seperated from the docs themselves can have benefits, e.g. easier >>>>> publishing of news, articles and so on. We'd become more dynamic. >>>>> >>>>> On 31.03.2010 21:07, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I prefer the textile approach, just making it easier to write& deploy >>>>>> docs. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Ulrich Stärk<[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess we should decide first whether we want the whole site in >>>>>>> source >>>>>>> control and done with Textile (or some other tool) or if we want to >>>>>>> split >>>>>>> documentation and site and have site in some content management >>>>>>> system like >>>>>>> the confluence wiki. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Uli >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 31.03.2010 18:49, Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am sorry for not being present at the moment. I am extremely busy >>>>>>>> in a >>>>>>>> new project. I will try to provide a Prototype using Textile as >>>>>>>> rendering base for the end of next week. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Regards, Christophe Cordenier. Developer of wooki @wookicentral.com
