On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:51:46 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> So if you have a service with marker @Blue @Red, then contribution >> methods with no markers, or with markers @Blue, @Red, or @Blue @Red >> would be invoked. > > Unmarked services are more generic than marked ones. No markers = all > possible markers. I think the above logic is correct. >
Agreed, but this is tricky stuff to think about; wanted to make sure we got it right. @Contribute is a great idea and I think we should, as part of the documentation rework, promote it as the preferred approach, with the naming convention considered less reliable and possible deprecated. > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and > instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
