On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:00:07 -0700, Howard Lewis Ship <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder if we could get rid of StartupDef (introduced in 5.2) and > instead, process @Startup methods as smart contributions to the > RegistryStartup service? I haven't looked deeply at this, just > feeling that less (API) is more.
I think that's doable, could check it out since I've been in that piece of code anyway for the last few days. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
