Please don't waste your time. I fixed it already. I'm running the build and going to commit it in few minutes.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Tom van Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:00:07 -0700, Howard Lewis Ship <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I wonder if we could get rid of StartupDef (introduced in 5.2) and > > instead, process @Startup methods as smart contributions to the > > RegistryStartup service? I haven't looked deeply at this, just > > feeling that less (API) is more. > > I think that's doable, could check it out since I've been in that piece of > code anyway for the last few days. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Best regards, Igor Drobiazko http://tapestry5.de
