On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:05:00 -0200, Igor Drobiazko > <[email protected]> wrote: >> since our last 5.3/5.4 discussion I've been thinking about JPA integration >> and came to the conclusion that Tapestry must have a built-in support for >> JPA. Even though I personally still prefer Hibernate, I'm pretty sure JPA >> is the future and we need to support it out of the box. > JPA 2 has most (if not all) the features Hibernate has that JPA 1 didn't. I > haven't used JPA yet, but I agree that it's the future.
Currently, Tynamo offers modules both for JPA1 and JPA2. Igor would need to work carefully to move the common logic to the orm module, but certainly it'd be better for code reusability. What would make this package orm specific? Not absolutely sure it needs to be, I know that Alex Kotchnev is at least thinking about making a tapestry-jdo module. Kalle --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
