On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Igor Drobiazko <[email protected]> wrote: > @Kalle: looks like Tynamo JPA integration only support a single persistence > unit per application? RIght? Am I missing something?
At the moment, yes. Kalle > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Kalle Korhonen > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:05:00 -0200, Igor Drobiazko >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> since our last 5.3/5.4 discussion I've been thinking about JPA >> integration >> >> and came to the conclusion that Tapestry must have a built-in support >> for >> >> JPA. Even though I personally still prefer Hibernate, I'm pretty sure >> JPA >> >> is the future and we need to support it out of the box. >> > JPA 2 has most (if not all) the features Hibernate has that JPA 1 didn't. >> I >> > haven't used JPA yet, but I agree that it's the future. >> >> Currently, Tynamo offers modules both for JPA1 and JPA2. Igor would >> need to work carefully to move the common logic to the orm module, but >> certainly it'd be better for code reusability. What would make this >> package orm specific? Not absolutely sure it needs to be, I know that >> Alex Kotchnev is at least thinking about making a tapestry-jdo module. >> >> Kalle >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > Igor Drobiazko > http://tapestry5.de > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
