Yeah, claiming any absolute number is tricky. It depends on how and
what you are looking at, but for the core alone, these coverage levels
(see 
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.2-dev/tapestry-core/cobertura/index.html)
are among the best I've ever seen in any project of similar size.
Opened INFRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3487

Kalle


On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Andreou <[email protected]> wrote:
> i remember seeing tapestry stats too somewhere...
> yep, here they are (for 5.3.0-SNAPSHOT):
> http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/14
>
> It reports a code coverage of 45,0% but that's probably because
> it can't run the browser based tests (also explains the 758 skipped tests)
>
> In the design menu, you'll see lot's of dependency cycles (in the package 
> level)
> but overal the rules compliance (whatever that means) seems very good
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 22:23, Igor Drobiazko <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It's amazing. The most Apache projects have a coverage under 50%.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at
>>> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for
>>> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC
>>> members.
>>>
>>> Kalle
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Igor Drobiazko
>> http://tapestry5.de
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andreas Andreou - [email protected] - http://blog.andyhot.gr
> Apache Tapestry PMC / http://chesstu.be owner
> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to