First report available: http://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/48022 - mirrors the results that Andreas linked to (selenium tests fail).
Kalle On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Kalle Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > No, not sure. I doubt the Selenium tests run regardless of Maven > version. Yes, site and reports configuration would need to be changed > for 3.x but that's separate. Figured I'll open the case first, see how > far we get and meanwhile try it out locally. > > Kalle > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Ulrich Stärk <[email protected]> wrote: >> You sure that Maven 3.0.2 will run the tests correctly? Last time I tried I >> had problems generating >> the site and running the component report with 3.0.2 but that might be a >> completely different beast. >> >> Uli >> >> On 03.03.2011 21:57, Kalle Korhonen wrote: >>> Yeah, claiming any absolute number is tricky. It depends on how and >>> what you are looking at, but for the core alone, these coverage levels >>> (see >>> http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.2-dev/tapestry-core/cobertura/index.html) >>> are among the best I've ever seen in any project of similar size. >>> Opened INFRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3487 >>> >>> Kalle >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Andreou <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> i remember seeing tapestry stats too somewhere... >>>> yep, here they are (for 5.3.0-SNAPSHOT): >>>> http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/14 >>>> >>>> It reports a code coverage of 45,0% but that's probably because >>>> it can't run the browser based tests (also explains the 758 skipped tests) >>>> >>>> In the design menu, you'll see lot's of dependency cycles (in the package >>>> level) >>>> but overal the rules compliance (whatever that means) seems very good >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 22:23, Igor Drobiazko <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> It's amazing. The most Apache projects have a coverage under 50%. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I just noticed there's a Sonar instance running at >>>>>> http://analysis.apache.org/. Could we get Tapestry on it? I'd ask for >>>>>> permissions myself but I'm pretty sure access is restricted to PMC >>>>>> members. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kalle >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Igor Drobiazko >>>>> http://tapestry5.de >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Andreas Andreou - [email protected] - http://blog.andyhot.gr >>>> Apache Tapestry PMC / http://chesstu.be owner >>>> Open Source / JEE Consulting >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
