All software has bugs but we we should really have some faith in our
automated testing suite. The 0 in 5.3.0 already indicates it's the
first release of 5.3 line and as such may have some features that are
not as well field tested than say, features in 5.2.6 release. Version
resolution works best if the version consists only of numbers. We
don't have an internal alpha/beta process and as such, any label we
add to the version is purely subjective. This is not an end user
application but a framework, any drastic issues are very likely to be
discovered during development of the web application. Many of the more
popular open source projects use just a running build number (Jenkins,
Jitsi, etc.) and they seem to be doing fine with that. If we cranked
out RCs, who would really put the effort to thoroughly manually test
them? If we just voted on them on the "yes, I've tried it" basis the
only thing we'd be adding is bureaucracy. Just my two cents and sorry
for the rant but my years in a big corporate have made me quite
allergic to resource waste.

Kalle


On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:15:47 -0300, Ulrich Stärk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I guess we can continue as before. The only thing I'd like to see changed
>> is the addition of the
>> status of the release to the version number. I.e. alpha, beta, ...
>
> Agreed. I'd just leave the stable releases without suffixes and append
> alpha, beta, rc or something like that to emphasize that a release isn't
> stable.
>
> To me, the last vote was confusing: it says "5.3.0" without any indication
> that it isn't a stable release. Anyone that doesn't follow the dev list
> would probably think it's a stable release, I guess.
>
> --
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and
> instructor
> Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
> http://www.arsmachina.com.br
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to