That would be really cool, but is it possible to do?

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Josh Canfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 3) This component takes an "encoder" parameter but does not support a>> 
>>> ValueEncoder configured to be provided automatically by Tapestry.
> It would be nice to migrate all of the collection based components to
> a generic form.
>
> With the generic information you could also pick the right value encoder.
>
> private Checklist<Fruit> userChecklist;
>
> would use the configured ValueEncoder<Fruit>.
>
> Josh
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Igor Drobiazko <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Bob Harner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> I've been meaning to bring this up for a while now. The new-for-5.3
>>> Checklist component has -- for me -- a couple of minor annoyances:
>>>
>>> 1) The label for each checkbox is positioned *before* (that is, to the
>>> left of) the checkbox. I think it is much more common to want the
>>> label *after* (to the right of) the checkbox.
>>>
>>
>> Can't it be done by overriding the CSS?
>>
>>>
>>> 2) The <label> for each checkbox is not connected to the checkbox with
>>> a "for" attribute, so you can't click on the label to check or uncheck
>>> the box.
>>>
>>
>> Fixed. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1747
>>
>>>
>>> 3) This component takes an "encoder" parameter but does not support a
>>> ValueEncoder configured to be provided automatically by Tapestry.
>>>
>>>
>> This is done for the same reason Palette component doesn't provide a
>> default encoder. We discussed that issue some time ago in the developers
>> list.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Igor Drobiazko
>> http://tapestry5.de
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to