On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:49:03 -0300, Bob Harner <[email protected]> wrote:
Yeah, I'm not defending it at all.
I know. :) I just commented because I think it does use solutions which I
think are quite bad and inneficient, as the right way would be to provide
a ValueEncoder (which we end up needing anyway) and a SelectModel.
But it's out there, and it's easy to use, so people are copying it.
After SelectModelFactory was added to Tapestry, IMHO, SelectObject should
be deleted and completely forgotten.
On Aug 10, 2012 3:38 PM, "Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo"
<[email protected]>
wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:09:21 -0300, Bob Harner <[email protected]>
wrote:
Out of the 10 Tapestry projects I searched through, the only
references to BeforeRenderTemplate or AfterRenderTemplate that I found
were in SelectObject components -- code that had been copied from
http://wiki.apache.org/**tapestry/Tapestry5SelectObject<http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5SelectObject>
Gosh, the code in that wiki page, IMHO, sucks.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.org<[email protected]>
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
