Hi, on 2013-01-14, in an effort to close some outdated JIRA issues, Uli added the label bulk-close-candidate to every issue that "has been last updated more than 1.5 years ago, has no assignee, affects an old version of Tapestry that is not actively developed anymore, and is therefore prone to be bulk-closed in the near future". Also, he asked the reporter to update the issue if it still was ... well, an issue. There are 31 issues that haven't been updated since:
https://bit.ly/1ld7yXJ or jql: project = TAP5 AND labels = bulk-close-candidate AND status = Open and updatedDate < "2013-01-14 15:47" I'd say we just close those with another friendly comment. What do you think? I guess, we should also repeat this procedure for issues that affect only versions before 5.3. Jochen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
