+1 On 2014-05-12 19:51, Jochen Kemnade wrote: > Hi, > > on 2013-01-14, in an effort to close some outdated JIRA issues, Uli added the > label > bulk-close-candidate to every issue that "has been last updated more than 1.5 > years ago, has no > assignee, affects an old version of Tapestry that is not actively developed > anymore, and is > therefore prone to be bulk-closed in the near future". Also, he asked the > reporter to update > the issue if it still was ... well, an issue. There are 31 issues that > haven't been updated > since: > > https://bit.ly/1ld7yXJ or jql: project = TAP5 AND labels = > bulk-close-candidate AND status = > Open and updatedDate < "2013-01-14 15:47" > > I'd say we just close those with another friendly comment. What do you think? > I guess, we > should also repeat this procedure for issues that affect only versions before > 5.3. > > Jochen >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
