I like the idea of renaming the project.Maybe Hivemind 2 since the original hivemind is retired as specified by its website.
In the end though if we want greater adoption it should separate its self from the tapestry build / release On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Dimitris, I'm not (at this stage) suggesting to move tapestry-ioc > outside of the tapestry build / release. I'm just suggesting a rename at > the moment and it can live inside the tapestry build, similar to plastic. > On 19 Jul 2014 09:11, "Dimitris Zenios" <dimitris.zen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I use tapestry-ioc in many projects outside of tapestry web framework. > > > > I agree that it should be taken out of the tapestry-web and form its own > > project. > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I asked this question before I was a committer and generally got good > > > feedback but it never really went anywhere. > > > > > > I think having tapestry-ioc and tapestry (the web framework) is a bit > > > confusing. I also feel that it hinders the promotion / adoption of > > > tapestry-ioc as a standalone product. > > > > > > So, I have some questions to consider. > > > 1. Do you agree that tapestry-ioc should be renamed? > > > 2. Do you think it should be called hivemind? > > > 3. Do you have an alternative name? > > > 4. Should a rename be done as part of 5.4 or 5.5? > > > > > > If the feedback to this thread forms a general consensus, I'll put it > to > > a > > > proper vote. > > > > > > Lance. > > > > > >
