Looking at the mygrid pages I suggest coping the following pages: http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/SCUFL2 http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Scufl2-DataLink http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Scufl2-Processors http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Scufl2-Profile http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Scufl2+URIs http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/SCUFL2+use+cases http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Scufl2-Workflow http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Scufl2-WorkflowBundle http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Taverna+Workflow+Bundle http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Taverna+URI+templates
I suggest not folling these pages as the are marked as old or incomplete. Do we need stubs for any of these or do I just remove the links? http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/SCUFL2+API http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Scufl2+Ontology http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/SCUFL2+language http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=5211689 http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/2011-02+Scufl2+status http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/2011-02+Data+bundle I was also not going to copy the proposal pages across: http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/2013-06-12+Configuration+as+JSON http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/2010-05+Semantification http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/TAVOSGI/2013-02+Data+bundle+requirements There is a lot of use of "http://ns.taverna.org.uk/2010/workflows"; expecialy in minted URIs 1. Is this still correct?2. As that points to http://taverna.incubator.apache.org/ns/2010/workflows we should put a holding page there.
Christian On 27/02/2015 14:25, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Taverna+Workflow+Bundle https://w3id.org/bundle
