-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello,

The vote is now closed. The tally is:

+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
- -0

Which gives a total of +5 and allows us to start a vote on the
general@incubator list.

Thank you to everyone who voted.

Cheers,

Ian

On 03/08/2015 10:16, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> As Andy and Stian have pointed out I referenced the wrong commit
> in the original [VOTE] email. I was getting a bit ahead of myself.
> The commits in the release are:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-maven-pare
nt
>
> 
.git;a=commit;h=b12a1cc0ed2540507ab43107124e8ee911da4ddf
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-language.g
it
>
> 
;a=commit;h=e2a9954e796d886d137eed3091b21637e9c8d1fd
> 
> So, due to this error I suggest we keep the vote open for another
> 24 hours and close at midnight GMT on 4 August 2015.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
> On 01/08/2015 12:57, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> Thank you to Ian for putting this together.
> 
>> Downloaded source. Signatures and build OK.
> 
>> But there some point issues which mount up to me voting
> 
>> -0
> 
>> Comments:
> 
>> 1/ The NOTICE says:
> 
>> """ Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation """
> 
>> The Apache ICLA does not transfer copyright.  Copyright remains 
>> with the original contributor.  The ICLA is a license-to-use.
> 
>> 2/ commits mis-aligned (good catch by Stian)
> 
>> It would be good if the Release Manager sent an email saying "the
>>  commits should have been ..." and giving 24 hours for
>> objections to continue the vote as is.  That said, items here
>> might make it worth RC5 to tidy up.
> 
>> language:
> 
>> 3/ L&N in every jar
> 
>> I found
> 
>> ./taverna-scufl2-schemas/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE 
>> ./taverna-scufl2-wfdesc/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE 
>> ./taverna-scufl2-ucfpackage/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE 
>> ./taverna-robundle/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE
> 
>> and there is material in these NOTICE files deeper in which (1) 
>> should be in LICENSE and (2) aren't rolled up into the top
>> files.
> 
>> In fact, the material is rolled up into the top level LICENSE so 
>> it's not "-1" territory for me.
> 
>> Andy
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVweGJAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5bj0H/0LQnvP0wzzCrCA1CZenvZfs
cXXD9JhI0QHNfzNE5E1fPoO4YQ0dH3hHuZAqtKIR2SO8d+I10aHf7OC7X09cWFPj
o695phfFXIpXH5k6C3Xhu3EiOCz/f4PRMe9EhQBCAHvxoi6N+bXVvCAIlh13lGs1
VREI0z5dCVEiXVauqXRjSKSD50XIsxjaR/z8KN1DSXF3G+24ZjdV9FFTUGrgq97v
XnvEYCKi/i7wSLAbhbaXjuqae/DC61Pj9twbmkrxS4EAp95ibu+gNg7ArStK5OZd
2c3Dshkq52BoJapdkTAO1r79iPZupT5fb8Y4TILTDPBuGqt9PySZDRRVXvED+Bc=
=cG6S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to