IP clearance from University of Manchester was signed 2015-02-04. (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2015)
Taverna Software Grant received & filed 2015-02-23 (wrongly reported as 2014-02-23 !) http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2015 so let's use the second one, 2015-02-23. I've updated http://incubator.apache.org/projects/taverna.html#Copyright I put 2015-07-13 as the license header date, as that is when most of the header commits seems to have been done by. I'm not sure what to put under Verify Distribution Rights > Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution that is > not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine with > Apache-licensed code and redistribute. I assume this covers just files inside our source trees, e.g. what would go into NOTICE or LICENSE? I think we have checked them all (Alan and Donal was doing this a year ago), but we haven't done the necessary updates in NOTICE and LICENSE in the git repositories which have not yet been released, e.g. https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-server/blob/master/NOTICE mentions some XSDs which are not yet declared. Does this checklist item relate to the NOTICE files or just checking the files? > Check and make sure that all source code distributed by the project is > covered by one or more of the following approved licenses: Apache, BSD, > Artistic, MIT/X, MIT/W3C, MPL 1.1, or something with essentially the same > terms. I've put 2015-01-13 for the second item, as that is when http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Third-party+licenses was last updated by Alan - but this was not formally completed. Alan, do you think that is a reasonable date? On 28 February 2016 at 20:59, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > (in good company!) > > What should the dates be? > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/taverna.html > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Copyright sign offs > Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:28:18 -0800 > From: Henri Yandell <[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > Haven't done this in a while :) > > Thought I'd share that the following podlings have not yet signed off on > their Copyright sections in their status reports. I mention this because I > believe it's one of the first elements that should be signed off on the > status report and it's a worry if projects have not done so: > > cmda > datafu > horn > johnzon > odftoolkit > openaz > samoa > slider > streams > taverna > > I'd be interested to hear about any reasons why the above aren't able to > sign that element of their status file off. > ... > > Hen > > > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
