Hi ,

I removed those section because practical session time is not fixed
.Sometime Our department change schedule various reasons. Lecture hours are
from 8 .00 - 13.00 So i can allocate 4- 5 hours per day for GSOC without
worring  and for days which i have Practical sessions it will be little
hard but i love what i do so i will manage it  . For End exam there will be
a study leave (1 week )  .So that period i don't have lectures or
Practicals thus i can use that time for preparing for Exam .


regards,
Thilina.


On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]>
wrote:

> hi!
>
> I think your proposal is good! Great seeing your engagement with the
> CWL community already, which you have documented well in the proposal.
>
>
> It's great that you list your other exam commitment - however I see
> you now removed the detail about lectures during weekdays (you said
> 8:00-16:00) - for which period of the calendar do you have lectures
> and practical sessions?
>
> This raised some concerns for me about GSOC working hours. However I
> see you have now added a section proposing 5h/day + 8-10h/day in the
> weekend - Note that if you also have the lectures and practical
> sessions this would leave you with basically no spare time at all
> (e.g. work 17-22 every night, 8:00-20:00 in weekend).
>
> Obviously we don't want GSOC to affect your exams - so it's good you
> have set aside time in your schedule for exams - I assume this also
> includes time to prepare for those exams?
>
>
> On 22 March 2016 at 11:03, Thilina Manamgoda <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do i need to add working hours per week in the proposal ?
> >
> >
> > regards
> > Thilina.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Thilina Manamgoda <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Thilina Manamgoda <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:14 AM
> >> Subject: Re: GSOC: Add CWL support to Taverna
> >> To: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Did you get my proposal ?.Can you comment what improvements are needed
> or
> >> my approach is correct or wrong ?
> >> Link :
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1knZSoKN-2oW7ljYwz5UFkcwjtd0tYRBs_zGsYBupx6U
> >> regards
> >> Thilina.
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>

Reply via email to