Hi Stain , alaninmcr had some concern regarding testing in the proposal so i have sent my appcroch in previous email .What about those ideas ?
regards thilina On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Thilina Manamgoda <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi , > > I removed those section because practical session time is not fixed > .Sometime Our department change schedule various reasons. Lecture hours are > from 8 .00 - 13.00 So i can allocate 4- 5 hours per day for GSOC without > worring and for days which i have Practical sessions it will be little > hard but i love what i do so i will manage it . For End exam there will be > a study leave (1 week ) .So that period i don't have lectures or > Practicals thus i can use that time for preparing for Exam . > > > regards, > Thilina. > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> hi! >> >> I think your proposal is good! Great seeing your engagement with the >> CWL community already, which you have documented well in the proposal. >> >> >> It's great that you list your other exam commitment - however I see >> you now removed the detail about lectures during weekdays (you said >> 8:00-16:00) - for which period of the calendar do you have lectures >> and practical sessions? >> >> This raised some concerns for me about GSOC working hours. However I >> see you have now added a section proposing 5h/day + 8-10h/day in the >> weekend - Note that if you also have the lectures and practical >> sessions this would leave you with basically no spare time at all >> (e.g. work 17-22 every night, 8:00-20:00 in weekend). >> >> Obviously we don't want GSOC to affect your exams - so it's good you >> have set aside time in your schedule for exams - I assume this also >> includes time to prepare for those exams? >> >> >> On 22 March 2016 at 11:03, Thilina Manamgoda <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Do i need to add working hours per week in the proposal ? >> > >> > >> > regards >> > Thilina. >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Thilina Manamgoda < >> [email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >> From: Thilina Manamgoda <[email protected]> >> >> Date: Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:14 AM >> >> Subject: Re: GSOC: Add CWL support to Taverna >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Did you get my proposal ?.Can you comment what improvements are needed >> or >> >> my approach is correct or wrong ? >> >> Link : >> >> >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1knZSoKN-2oW7ljYwz5UFkcwjtd0tYRBs_zGsYBupx6U >> >> regards >> >> Thilina. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Stian Soiland-Reyes >> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating) >> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 >> > >
